Please make sure your email address is up to date! | Archive of Our Own

ao3org:

We’re making some overdue improvements to the code that powers our login system. When we make these changes, all Archive users will be logged out of their accounts.

To avoid permanently losing access to your account, please make sure you know your password and/or can receive password reset emails by December 13.

For full details, please refer to the post.

Please make sure your email address is up to date! | Archive of Our Own

intersexgaysatanofficial:

xenoqueer:

excuuuuuse-you:

xenoqueer:

greatfay:

xenoqueer:

zombiepineapples:

fierceawakening:

themintycupcake:

xenoqueer:

a-polite-melody:

xenoqueer:

For all the people who insist that wearing kink accessories at pride is somehow sexually explicit, I have a quick quiz for you.

Which of these images are of “kink clothes” and which ones are of “normal” clothes:

image

Two pairs of knee high suede high heel boots, in black and in grey.

image

Brown leather hiking boots.

image

A pair of white flip flop sandals.

image

A double-strand silver chain necklace with a small silver heart.

image

A cage-style choker, with three levels of leather straps. Small metal rivets hold the necklace in shape, and a steel o-ring is affixed to the front of the necklace.

image

A black leather choker. Metal spikes protrude from the choker, holding thin metal chains. A steel o-ring is attached to the front of the choker.

image

A silver torque necklace, with a claddagh center.

image

A headband with fluffy cat ears attached. The ears also have a jingle bell.

image

A clip on, faux fur tail.

image

A complete “kitten” costume set, with ears on a headband, a clip on tail, pawprint mittens, and a collar with a bow and jingle bell.

image

A pair of asymmetrical, fingerless black leather gloves.

image

An asymmetrical silver open torque necklace.

image

A black cuff bracelet made of several different kinds of leather strap and cord, knotted together in various patterns.

image

A matched set of necklaces, each being half of a heart. One necklace is a key that fits into the lock of the other necklace.

image

A full body jumpsuit made of black leather.

image

A collection of black leather garter belts in various designs, including hearts, spikes, and pentagrams.

image

A pair of fine mesh fishnet stockings.

So, did you make your guesses?

Here’s the answers then:

Only one of these items was a “kink” item.

The silver torque necklace with claddagh.

Every single other item pictured here is just regular old fashion. Well, as long as you ignore the fact that plain white flip flops are considered a particularly good choice for making foot fetish videos (and yes, this is obviously a link to a foot fetish video).

There is nothing “sexually explicit” about people wearing clothes unless those clothes actually reveal genitals.

Even “kink clothes.”

In other words, there’s not really a line between fashion items (especially punk, goth, and other “edgier” styles of fashion) and “kink clothes.”

Exactly.

Oh yeah, punk and goth fashion has very deep roots in kink and queer scenes. My girlfriend was telling me this last weekend. It comes from the idea of sexual liberation and saying “fuck you” to respectability (aka conservative puritanism).

They copied us and called it “fashion” (which is perfectly fine with me)

But then they said “don’t look too much like yourselves in public, AFTER we’ve recontextualized your signals”

(Which is 30000% not fine with me)

Like… I don’t love a lot of tumblr’s Discourse about cultural appropriation

But “we are allowed to dress like you because we don’t mean it, but YOU need to dress like us at pride, because you do mean it” seems like it should count

i need someone to explain to me why “
The silver torque necklace with claddagh“ is a kink item, please?

Unlike the other necklaces shown here, it is actually a collar, with a lock in the back that prevents the wearer from removing it without the key. The key is usually held by one of the wearer’s partners.

If, as your tags suggested, you’re interested in this style of necklace without the powerplay aspect, they’re called “torques” and are either permanently open in the back (similar to many wide bracelets), or latch in the back. Some modern toques move the permanent opening to the front, and do fun decorative things with it, like the second torque seen in this set of images.

When I see the “no kink stuff at pride” I usually picture ball gags, those leather ski-masks, and people walking on all fours while someone else holds the leash and they bark at people, not kink-ambiguous fashion items

Okay, that’s fair, (though it is emphatically not an opinion shared by many, many sex-negative types) allow me to ask this:

What actually differentiates wearing a bandana around your face from wearing a ballgag around your face. What makes one harmless and the other “sexually explicit” given that both are just covering a part of your face?

What makes wearing a pup-hood sexually explicit, when it does not expose your sex organs in any way, and how does it meaningfully differ from someone wearing cosplay that involves masks, such as superheroes?

What about walking on all fours constitutes a sex act, and if I do so while wearing a tuxedo or a sundress rather than a pair of shorts and a crop top, does it stop being sexual? 

What differentiates someone holding a leash from someone holding another person’s hands, or hugging them in public, especially given that handholding and hugs involve much more physical contact?

The assumption that wearing clothing is a sex act is. Well, it’s absurd.

Specifically on ballgags, they’re exclusively used for sex or violence.

If anyone can tell me otherwise, I’ll change my mind. I can’t think of anything else of the cuff, and from that initial judgement I really can’t see how they specifically are appropriate

I’ve got a migraine slowly encroaching on my brain, so I apologize if I sound short tempered.

An alternative use for ball gags is marching.

If a ball gag is being worn to march in a parade, then at that moment it’s not being worn during sex or during an act of violence. If neither sex not violence are occurring, the ball gag doesn’t spontaneously disappear.

It’s not exposing genitals, it’s not being used to achieve sexual gratification, and it’s not being used to cause harm to others.

In that moment it is not a tool of sex or violence.

It’s simply an accessory.

If you can set aside your preconceptions, you’ll find quite quickly that there is no inherent sexual value in a ball gag, any more so than there is in a necktie. It’s certainly a common enough fetish, yes, but so are hands, and hair, and necks. So are leather jackets and short shorts and toplessness.

Yet, these things are considered acceptable to wear or expose, even if you yourself have a fetish for them. People with a fetish for high heels are not obligated to exclusively wear flats simply because sometimes heels appear in their sex lives.

There is no exposed sex organ or active sex act involved in someone wearing a gag near you.

I’ve definitely seen gags being used during marches and protests as a “we will not be silenced” kind of thing, so there’s that too.

Would you say that no-one should wear hankies in their pockets? Because
the hanky code IS a sexual code, after all. It’s specifically telling
others what your kinks are, if you’re a top or bottom, if you’re a sub
or dom etc.

Also, those leather hoods? I’ve heard kids say stuff like the person must be a superhero because they’re dressed up like Batman or Black Panther. Hell, Catwoman wears a leather catsuit and cat-eared leather hood in canon, so if some guy wears a leather puppy-hood during a pride parade that wouldn’t be inherently sexual.

Will adults be aware that it’s a thing that can be used during sex? Yes, but it’s not being used in sex at that moment. Just like a kid coming across some fuzzy handcuffs isn’t going to be scarred for life, just because mom and dad use it to spice up their bedroom antics.

There’s also a huge difference between dressing up for pride (where this kind of clothing is considered appropriate!) versus exhibitionism / indecent exposure in areas which have stricter rules regarding what clothing is appropriate. (no shirt, no shoes, no service, anyone?)

bisexualsastiel:

enf-uckedu-p:

timetravelonion:

twinkby:

normalising gay relationships and combatting the homophobia and violence gay people face for being in relationships is way more important than normalising straights being friends lol

If men cant be close friends with other men because they’re afraid people will think they’re gay, the problem is homophobia

no, the problem is people like you obsessively insisting every guy who looks at another guy is gay and theyre in love and then writing about them having sex when they barely even know each other. notice how this isn’t a problem with women??? because women being affectionate is normalized and society thinks men can’t possibly be affectionate unless they’re gay because men are “cold” and “emotionless” and “stoic”

the problem is MISANDRY not homophobia lol

until men can be affectionate towards other men in peace then gay men cant exist in peace either because they get glorified and fetishized

Comparing women making fanwork of fictional men from fictional stories to real life homophobic problems towards real life men? It’s more likely than you think.

The niche hobbies of teenage/adult women on tunglr dot com have no bearing on a top-down systematic and social problem created by religion and homophobes that has been around for thousands of years. 😂

Except that it’s NOT just that. It’s about bullshit like RPF and people obsessively shipping men who show up even a few times together LONG AFTER THEY HAVE SAID THEY ARE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH IT.

Septiplier.
DanxPhil.
The guys from Supernatural…

Except you don’t really care as long as you get to keep on with your “hobby.” 

lewiscarrolatemybrain:

I am so sick of the “Not like other girls” trope in YA literature.

Give me Abercrombie barbie-doll with perfectly applied eyeliner running full-throttle into danger to protect her rag-tag group of misfit friends.
Give me the hella nerdy girl best friends with the cheerleader because they bumped into each other at a book store and started comparing favorite authors.
Stop acting like “other girls” is some kind of insult. Stop encouraging people’s special snowflake complexes. Stop acting like you can only be worth something if you treat all the other women in your life like they’re beneath you.

Buffy.

You want Buffy.

Gender and pleasure

scofflawsins:

house-of-crows:

psshaw:

hobbitkaiju:

So much of the Euro-American understanding of being trans (or anything other than 100% constantly identified with your assigned gender) focuses on discomfort. 

Some people take this idea to an extreme and claim you can’t be trans unless you hate your body and want every surgery available to you. As many other writers have said before, that’s not true. It’s perfectly possible to be trans with only mild dysphoria or none at all. It’s perfectly possible to be trans and have a mental map of your body that looks just like the one you already have. 

But I’d like to push even harder against the idea that trans=discomfort. I’d like to offer this: sometimes the exploration of one’s gender can be motivated by pleasure rather than discomfort. 

Let me give an example. Let’s say there’s a person named Cal. Most people think of Cal as a boy, and Cal’s all right with that. So far as Cal’s concerned, a boy isn’t a bad thing to be. But sometimes, Cal likes to imagine being a girl and being treated as a girl. Those fantasies are always accompanied by feelings of pleasure, satisfaction, anticipation, and warmth. Eventually, having had these thoughts for years, Cal asks people to use ‘she’ pronouns in private and to refer to her as a girl. Cal does this for another year before claiming the label “trans”. 

Some people would say a person like Cal can’t be trans because there’s no dysphoria, self-hatred, distress, or even discomfort. There’s just a pleasure-based preference. But why is distress necessary? Why are trans people supposed to be defined solely by our pain and self-hatred?

It’s my opinion that defining trans people solely by discomfort is an aspect of transphobia. The idea behind trans=discomfort is that being anything other than 100% cis is so awful that no one would do it unless the alternative were unlivable. Think about that: defining trans people solely by their experiences of discomfort means believing that being trans is so awful that only misery could drive us to it. And to me, that sounds like the thinking of someone who really hates trans people.

So I’ll come out and say it: sometimes transition or self-exploration of gender is not just about lessening discomfort, but is about improving and deepening the pleasure we take in our lives. 

“Think about that: defining trans people solely by their experiences of discomfort means believing that being trans is so awful that only misery could drive us to it.”

Honestly, speaking as a trans person, the understanding of dysphoria and the intense discomfort to the point of catonia that I have experienced personally just reminds me “Hey, you didn’t actually choose this, just like you didn’t choose your orientation. This just is.” 

It’s less about self loathing and more comforting in that no, I didn’t somehow convince myself that I need super expensive surgery or have some sort of mental condition wherein my need for chance was influenced by some sort of incurable dysmorphia. 

Pain is the body’s way of telling you that something is wrong and needs to change. Without some sort of signal, you can and will do more harm than good by undergoing invasive, painful, surgeries that have long heal times and hefty price tags that many have to crowdfund or go into crippling debt for. 

Using dysphoria as a barometer for “transness” is a good thing. It’s much less about “you must be this dysphoric to transition” and more “hey if you don’t have dysphoria NOW you probably will after transitioning to some degree or another.” Wanting to keep teens and young adults who have had no time in their bodies to understand what they’re about to do is important… that’s why nonsurgical options like hormone blockers and therapy are needed. A stop-gap to soothe the symptoms while making sure of the disease. 

Just like you take generalized painkillers while figuring out the cause of your headache instead of assuming “hey it’s a tumor we need to operate right this minute!” 


Gender Euphoria is a wonderful thing. Feeling affirmed in your gender is a wonderful thing. Not experiencing dysphoria must be awesome, wish I knew what that was like. But saying “you don’t need dysphoria to be trans” is… problematic at best. While it might be much more accurate to say “you don’t need dysphoria to be trans but you DO need it to medically transition” due to the likelihood of regret in that case, there’s still issues with that sort of gatekeeping and infringement of autonomy. I can think the way I do and still admit that as a rational adult that the best course lies in the middle somewhere.

But all of this is why trans surgeries and hormones are only barely covered by insurances; at least in my last state; when they’re covered at all, and why the medical field is so slow to adapt. They don’t want to get sued when the 17 year old who thinks they’re a dude wakes up after surgery screaming because they didn’t expect it would be like this and their unrealistic expectations bite them in the ass.

Point is, this shit can take a lot of time. But funneling young people into logical and rational behavior instead of pumping them full of hormones is for the best, and so is making sure they have to wait until 18 to get permanent surgical alterations to their bodies. If they have to wait for piercings or tattoos, then they should have to wait for surgery too. In the meantime, hormone blockers, therapy, and self awareness play a part. 

It’s not self loathing to try to understand WHY dysphoria is a thing, and sit with it, and try to figure out what your ideal day-to-day is going to look like down the line and what the more likely reality is. “Oh I’ll have the perfect male chest and run around shirtless and-” Nah bro, you’re far more likely to have large scars and awkward mid-puberty bod for at least a few years, your voice may never drop, HRT is a scattershot without much choice in what you get or when, and seeing the reality in the mirror can be just as damaging if you don’t already have dysphoria that those surgeries and HRT is designed to treat. 

You don’t undergo chemo if you don’t have cancer. And even if you really, really like body mods and want to get massive implants and cover yourself in tattoos, you still need to think logically about the ramifications of your actions and what it will mean for your life going forward beyond idealized fantasies.

Next time save us all an essay and just fuckin say ‘those dirty transtrenders are ruining The Trans for the rest of us!!!’

Next time, don’t cherry pick~ It’s not about calling people “trenders” it’s about making sure they actually know what they’re doing instead of assuming they know exactly what’s wrong and rushing off for a quick fix for an underlying problem they’re not addressing.

I’ve got no issue with GQ/fluid/Agender/whatever label people want to use. What I DO have an issue with is someone signing off on something they don’t understand the ramifications of that is INCREDIBLY hard to walk back.

Gender and pleasure

psshaw:

hobbitkaiju:

So much of the Euro-American understanding of being trans (or anything other than 100% constantly identified with your assigned gender) focuses on discomfort. 

Some people take this idea to an extreme and claim you can’t be trans unless you hate your body and want every surgery available to you. As many other writers have said before, that’s not true. It’s perfectly possible to be trans with only mild dysphoria or none at all. It’s perfectly possible to be trans and have a mental map of your body that looks just like the one you already have. 

But I’d like to push even harder against the idea that trans=discomfort. I’d like to offer this: sometimes the exploration of one’s gender can be motivated by pleasure rather than discomfort. 

Let me give an example. Let’s say there’s a person named Cal. Most people think of Cal as a boy, and Cal’s all right with that. So far as Cal’s concerned, a boy isn’t a bad thing to be. But sometimes, Cal likes to imagine being a girl and being treated as a girl. Those fantasies are always accompanied by feelings of pleasure, satisfaction, anticipation, and warmth. Eventually, having had these thoughts for years, Cal asks people to use ‘she’ pronouns in private and to refer to her as a girl. Cal does this for another year before claiming the label “trans”. 

Some people would say a person like Cal can’t be trans because there’s no dysphoria, self-hatred, distress, or even discomfort. There’s just a pleasure-based preference. But why is distress necessary? Why are trans people supposed to be defined solely by our pain and self-hatred?

It’s my opinion that defining trans people solely by discomfort is an aspect of transphobia. The idea behind trans=discomfort is that being anything other than 100% cis is so awful that no one would do it unless the alternative were unlivable. Think about that: defining trans people solely by their experiences of discomfort means believing that being trans is so awful that only misery could drive us to it. And to me, that sounds like the thinking of someone who really hates trans people.

So I’ll come out and say it: sometimes transition or self-exploration of gender is not just about lessening discomfort, but is about improving and deepening the pleasure we take in our lives. 

“Think about that: defining trans people solely by their experiences of discomfort means believing that being trans is so awful that only misery could drive us to it.”

Honestly, speaking as a trans person, the understanding of dysphoria and the intense discomfort to the point of catonia that I have experienced personally just reminds me “Hey, you didn’t actually choose this, just like you didn’t choose your orientation. This just is.” 

It’s less about self loathing and more comforting in that no, I didn’t somehow convince myself that I need super expensive surgery or have some sort of mental condition wherein my need for chance was influenced by some sort of incurable dysmorphia. 

Pain is the body’s way of telling you that something is wrong and needs to change. Without some sort of signal, you can and will do more harm than good by undergoing invasive, painful, surgeries that have long heal times and hefty price tags that many have to crowdfund or go into crippling debt for. 

Using dysphoria as a barometer for “transness” is a good thing. It’s much less about “you must be this dysphoric to transition” and more “hey if you don’t have dysphoria NOW you probably will after transitioning to some degree or another.” Wanting to keep teens and young adults who have had no time in their bodies to understand what they’re about to do is important… that’s why nonsurgical options like hormone blockers and therapy are needed. A stop-gap to soothe the symptoms while making sure of the disease. 

Just like you take generalized painkillers while figuring out the cause of your headache instead of assuming “hey it’s a tumor we need to operate right this minute!” 


Gender Euphoria is a wonderful thing. Feeling affirmed in your gender is a wonderful thing. Not experiencing dysphoria must be awesome, wish I knew what that was like. But saying “you don’t need dysphoria to be trans” is… problematic at best. While it might be much more accurate to say “you don’t need dysphoria to be trans but you DO need it to medically transition” due to the likelihood of regret in that case, there’s still issues with that sort of gatekeeping and infringement of autonomy. I can think the way I do and still admit that as a rational adult that the best course lies in the middle somewhere.

But all of this is why trans surgeries and hormones are only barely covered by insurances; at least in my last state; when they’re covered at all, and why the medical field is so slow to adapt. They don’t want to get sued when the 17 year old who thinks they’re a dude wakes up after surgery screaming because they didn’t expect it would be like this and their unrealistic expectations bite them in the ass.

Point is, this shit can take a lot of time. But funneling young people into logical and rational behavior instead of pumping them full of hormones is for the best, and so is making sure they have to wait until 18 to get permanent surgical alterations to their bodies. If they have to wait for piercings or tattoos, then they should have to wait for surgery too. In the meantime, hormone blockers, therapy, and self awareness play a part. 

It’s not self loathing to try to understand WHY dysphoria is a thing, and sit with it, and try to figure out what your ideal day-to-day is going to look like down the line and what the more likely reality is. “Oh I’ll have the perfect male chest and run around shirtless and-” Nah bro, you’re far more likely to have large scars and awkward mid-puberty bod for at least a few years, your voice may never drop, HRT is a scattershot without much choice in what you get or when, and seeing the reality in the mirror can be just as damaging if you don’t already have dysphoria that those surgeries and HRT is designed to treat. 

You don’t undergo chemo if you don’t have cancer. And even if you really, really like body mods and want to get massive implants and cover yourself in tattoos, you still need to think logically about the ramifications of your actions and what it will mean for your life going forward beyond idealized fantasies.

thebibliosphere:

questionabledemon:

thebibliosphere:

thantos1991:

elfwreck:

whreflections:

wellcometothedarkside:

meeedeee:

meeedeee:

meeedeee:

meeedeee:

List of banned searches/tags on Tumblr

Tumblr purge

Chronic pain

Sex

Breast

Yaoi

Lolita

Safe sex

Dick

Why ban yaoi??? 😳

I literally did not believe this was a real thing until I just tried it.

Holy cow. 

I have spent the last two weeks increasingly irritated with (what has seemed to me) the dramatically alarmist attitude about the shit that’s going down with tumblr but….damn.  

Like, I still don’t think it’s over.  I still don’t think this is the end.  But that’s a far larger speed bump that I anticipated.  Tumblr, what the fuck.  

“Dick pic” is also gone. “Pictures of dicks” gets you Dick Grayson. 

“Fuck” and “fuck off” will get blogs with those word in the description, but no posts.

Several slurs are gone – fag, slut, whore; probably others. “Dyke” is still in, though, as well as “fag hag.” (I’m aware that whether or not those are slurs depends on the community.) 

This is a sign of a platform that Does Not Care about its users. Not because they’re blocking terms they’ve decided are offensive or connected with illegal activity – because they won’t tell you that some terms can’t be searched, won’t tell you why the posts have been removed from search, won’t let you know whether or how your blog will be affected.

Chronic pain, as mentioned, is gone. “Pain” gets this result:

Followed by normal search results. (Note: 7 Cups of Tea, at least, is a commercial site; the “trained active listeners” are random users who’ve completed a few questionnaires.)

@thebibliosphere Joy joy joy joy joy…. If your wondering about a sudden slow down on your traffic

My traffic hasn’t slowed down because I use my own tag for my chronic health stuff, though a couple of my posts about chronic pain are gone.

Other than that my nsfw stuff is still intact. This purge has been random as all hell.

The fact that it’s been over a week and they haven’t even addressed the many many unfairly deactivated blogs is pissing me right off.

I highly doubt at this point that I’m getting my blog back at all. Despite the fact that my only crime was to write a lot about having chronic pain and what it was like to live like that

Also of fucking course one of the blocked tags is the one discussing their screw up

I’m feeling very bitter at the moment

If it’s anything like the mass censorship LJ started employing, then I very much doubt this is even the tip of the iceberg, or that they’ll make it a priority to restore unfairly banned blogs.

Meanwhile I continue to block upwards of 50 pornbot blogs a week from my follower list, and I can’t turn my inbox back on because it winds up with a bunch of neo-nazis sending me suicide bait.

But sure. Deleting my posts about being disabled is helping. Thanks Tumblr.

I woke to the Dreaming for the first time in a long time.

I was back in the cult-church of my youth. I felt the earth shake with every strike from orbit, heard the fire and damnation from the pulpit, read the news on my phone with shaking, terrified hands; recognizing, somehow, that this truly was the End. There was no final chapter, it was being written around us and the last time I’d Dreamed this had been 2010 in a run-down apartment as I watched the sky torn asunder and the earth split.

The cold weight of the veil hung heavy on my head and across my shoulders as I gripped my phone in hands going white and blue from effort and chill. My brother shook me, tried to snap me out and away to go do something, anything, but sit tamely by. I refused. Not out of piety or false modesty, but because I knew I was not yet ready to believe it. 

And so I sat, listening to the drone of people behind me as they stayed or left or ran downstairs in despair for coffee and soda and whatever creature comforts had been brought by the congregation. And I… stayed until it was finished.


The downstairs of the church had a stairway, a singular landing, and another few steps down to the basement floor. Plain white and grey “marble” tile, folding chairs and tables, and old accordion-style “walls” that could be dragged from the edges of the room to create classrooms, or meeting areas closed off from the rest of the area. A few were being used as impromptu praying circles, but for the most part the church had cleared by the time I went below.

It seems in Dreams there’s nothing left for me in this space; which makes sense since the Severing I performed, and the fact that I simply want nothing to do with this place any longer, even if I AM dragged back night after night. 

I took nothing from them, this time, save the knowledge of who was present and who was missing, and exited the church from below. 


I found myself in the parking lot, my small tabby in my arms as I ran along the lilac bushes for the cars, SCREAMING with everything I had for help. She made no move to bite or claw, knowing as I did that all the youths behind me had been torturing her. The leader kept approaching, hand held out demanding her return. I refused. He looked nearly apologetic as he kept coming, saying “But I have to.” I refused a third time, and the world went sideways.


I was back in the basement, cat nowhere to be found which didn’t feel strange. Jeff, Susan, and a few other shadowy figures stood around me, saying things like this was our final chance to do whatever it was we hadn’t yet. 

He referenced the local tattoo shop, and also “Who’s feathers say *static*…?” I knew he was referencing my tattoos even though I don’t currently have any with feathers. I was also granted an image of my next ink, the layout, and the words that will be encircling it.


I woke to the sound of an owl outside somewhere in the neighborhood. 

Watch Me Rise indeed.